{"id":4137,"date":"2011-02-27T21:53:11","date_gmt":"2011-02-27T21:53:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mrsokana.wordpress.com\/?p=4137"},"modified":"2011-02-27T21:53:11","modified_gmt":"2011-02-27T21:53:11","slug":"venus-with-biceps-david-l-chapman-patricia-vertinsky","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/anakanaschofield.com\/website_66900629\/2011\/02\/27\/venus-with-biceps-david-l-chapman-patricia-vertinsky\/","title":{"rendered":"Venus with Biceps: David L Chapman &#038; Patricia Vertinsky"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Venus with Biceps: A Pictorial History of Muscular Women by David L. Chapman &amp; Patricia Vertinsky<\/p>\n<p>Arsenal Pulp Press, $29.95, 359 pages<\/p>\n<p>Got  muscles? Expect scrutiny if you&#8217;re female. Venus with Biceps  interrogates the history and taboos of female muscularity and pairs a  taut consideration with a diligent pictorial unearthing.<\/p>\n<p>This  welcome book is interspersed with chapters outlining the limited  perceptions placed on women&#8217;s bodies and how they have progressed,  regressed and progressed again. David L. Chapman, who culled and amassed  more than 200 images for this book, unveils a riveting history of  strongwomen with roots in theatricality, athleticism, performance,  ancient Greece and exhibitionism.<\/p>\n<p>The images come in varied  sources and forms: photos, advertisements, illustrations, comics,  posters and even cigarette cards, up until the 1980s. We can understand  plenty from these rare images, including what informs the continuing  relentless scrutiny of women&#8217;s bodies today (a scrutiny that  increasingly extends to expectations even of the pregnant body).<\/p>\n<p>There  have always been ardent opinions on the female form that often bore  little relation to biology or the potential women have for developing  strong musculature.<\/p>\n<p>The obvious development of muscle -a sign of  male power -in women was considered a masculinization of the female  body. It is still subject to critique and reactions of fear and disgust  in the mainstream celeb-obsessed media. As the art critic and novelist  John Berger wrote in Ways of Seeing, &#8220;Men are expected to act, women to  appear.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>At the start of the 20th century the first strongwomen  appeared on the fete, carnival and circus scene. They were viewed with  freak-show bemusement by an audience of men seeking titillation.  Curiously, there was often a family link to strongwomen; she might be  the daughter of a strongman or in the case of Melina, the wife of  strongman Louis Cyr. Athleta, a Belgian strongwoman known for lifting  half a dozen men and a large barbell, had three daughters who were all  raised to be strongwomen.<\/p>\n<p>A shift began in the 1920s that saw a change in attitudes toward embracing a new model of &#8220;able-bodied womanhood.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Victorian  prudery was out; the flapper was in. There was more evidence in photos  of displaying muscles in contrast to earlier attempts to disguise them,  with the hourglass figure upheld as the ideal.<\/p>\n<p>The Great  Depression of the 1930s sent attitudes spiralling backwards towards  &#8220;traditional expectations&#8221; and &#8220;womanly allure&#8221;, although a &#8220;lightly  muscled body could be considered attractive.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Emphasis on the  female body distinctly changed after and during times of war. Women were  required to participate in physical labour and that participation was  recognized as vital. The attitude was that women needed to be fit and  strong in order to serve their country and the war effort. The 1940s saw  the advent of Wonder Woman and role models such as Rosie the Riveter,  who personified working women. Towards the end of the 1940s, female  athletes also saw more respect for their ability and physique.<\/p>\n<p>Between  the 1950s and 1970s, all the progress was essentially lost and muscular  women appeared to vanish. Then, in 1977, the first bodybuilding  competition that judged women&#8217;s muscles -not their beauty -took place at  the YMCA in Canton, Ohio.<\/p>\n<p>David L. Chapman and Patricia Vertinsky  are to be admired for this excavation and excising of these visual  records and stories from obscurity. This is a reading opportunity that  can only be described as uplifting, informative and delicious. The book  is not weighed down with an overly academic tone; the tone is one of  consideration, historical context and fun insight. It does not purport  to be an exacting record, but it is a delightful departure point for  readers and enthusiasts and a reference to aid the constant inquiries  those with mysteriously large calf muscles must engage with, in the  experience of this former gymnast reviewer.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Biblioasis will be publishing Anakana Schofield&#8217;s novel Malarky next year.<\/strong><\/p>\n<div>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vancouversun.com\/impressive+display+female+strength\/4352669\/story.html#ixzz1FCMecPHR\"><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Venus with Biceps: A Pictorial History of Muscular Women by David L. Chapman &amp; Patricia Vertinsky Arsenal Pulp Press, $29.95, 359 pages Got muscles? Expect scrutiny if you&#8217;re female. Venus with Biceps interrogates the history and taboos of female muscularity and pairs a taut consideration with a diligent pictorial unearthing. This welcome book is interspersed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[169,373,657,894,1088,1259],"class_list":["post-4137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anakana-schofield","tag-anakana-schofield","tag-david-l-chapman","tag-john-berger","tag-patricia-vertinsky","tag-strongwomen","tag-venus-with-biceps"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/anakanaschofield.com\/website_66900629\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/anakanaschofield.com\/website_66900629\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/anakanaschofield.com\/website_66900629\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anakanaschofield.com\/website_66900629\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anakanaschofield.com\/website_66900629\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4137"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/anakanaschofield.com\/website_66900629\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4137\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/anakanaschofield.com\/website_66900629\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anakanaschofield.com\/website_66900629\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anakanaschofield.com\/website_66900629\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}